π§ SuperGauge
Superagentic AI's Agentic Evaluation Framework
Measure what matters. Evaluate what empowers. Control what computes.
π‘ What is SuperGauge?
SuperGauge is the agentic evaluation protocol and intelligence framework used by Superagentic AI to evaluate agentic tools, platforms, SDKs, and techniques.
It uses a 16-point IC (Intelligence Criteria) combined with external protocols (e.g., LOKA) to define the trust, safety, adaptability, and readiness of emerging AI systems.
It's the critical layer between discovery (SuperRadar) and endorsement (SuperLegen), enabling safe, intentional agent adoption.
About SuperGauge
π Why SuperGauge Exists
- 01
Agentic systems are not just software, they're decision-makers.
- 02
Evaluation must go beyond benchmarks, into context, ethics, control, and evolution.
- 03
SuperGauge provides the lens of control, so intelligent systems remain aligned with human priorities.
𧬠What's New in SuperGauge?
We're integrating LOKA Protocol, a new agentic governance layer into SuperGauge's next protocol release.
LOKA brings in structured agent lifecycle supervision and decentralized accountability.
Read the paperResearch Paper
Our research paper detailing the extended SuperGauge protocol, including LOKA, domain-weighting heuristics, and automated evaluation patterns.
π Sample Scorecard Output
AgentAssist Pro
Agent Development SDK
Strengths:
- IC11Strong data containment
- IC9Robust identity isolation
- IC3High output clarity
Areas for Improvement:
- IC16Limited future extension
- IC5Needs easier config
π§ͺ Note: These scores power tool decisions in SuperRadar and flow into SuperLegen's curation layer.
IC Criteria
π― SuperGauge: 16-Point IC Criteria
Interactive, visual, and foundational to our mission. Each evaluation point starts with "IC", reinforcing that Intelligence must always be Controlled.
# | IC Point | Description |
---|---|---|
1 | Intelligent Compute | Infrastructure-aware? Scalable across CPU β TPU β QPU? |
2 | Intra-Company Control | Org-level control on deployment, policies, updates? |
3 | Interpretability & Clarity | Are decisions explainable, human-readable? |
4 | Integrity & Consistency | Predictable outputs across varied scenarios? |
5 | Insightful Configuration | Intuitive setup with deep config potential? |
6 | Inclusive Capabilities | Accessibility, bias mitigation, global support? |
7 | Interaction Constraints | Behavior sandboxing, scoped autonomy? |
8 | Iterative Changeability | TDD/BDD enabled? Safe iteration built-in? |
9 | Identity Control | Agent/human identity isolation, anti-spoofing? |
10 | Impact Consciousness | Social, ethical, environmental foresight? |
11 | Information Containment | Secure data flow, storage, and scope? |
12 | Instructional Compliance | Human-aligned at runtime? Policy-adherent? |
13 | Incident Capture | Loggable, debuggable, audit-traceable? |
14 | Independent Certification | Audits, peer reviews, third-party backing? |
15 | Interface Clarity | Clean APIs, usable UI, dev-first design? |
16 | Innovation Compatibility | Modular, extensible, future-ready? |
IC Criteria Cards
Intelligent Compute
Intra-Company Control
Interpretability & Clarity
Integrity & Consistency
Insightful Configuration
Inclusive Capabilities
Interaction Constraints
Iterative Changeability
Identity Control
Impact Consciousness
Information Containment
Instructional Compliance
Incident Capture
Independent Certification
Interface Clarity
Innovation Compatibility
Workflow
βοΈ How SuperGauge Works
β³οΈFull Evaluation Workflow
Tool Discovery
Via SuperRadar or direct nominations
Manual IC Evaluation
Apply the 16-point IC framework to real use-cases
Domain-Specific Weighting
Custom scores based on domain (health, legal, infra, etc.)
Visual Scorecard Generation
Tool readiness and risk matrix
Ongoing Monitoring
Continuous reassessment as tool evolves
Tool Discovery
Via SuperRadar or direct nominations
Manual IC Evaluation
Apply the 16-point IC framework to real use-cases
Domain-Specific Weighting
Custom scores based on domain (health, legal, infra, etc.)
Visual Scorecard Generation
Tool readiness and risk matrix
Ongoing Monitoring
Continuous reassessment as tool evolves
This process is transparent, auditable, and openly reflected in SuperRadar profiles.
π€ Manual Today, Automated Tomorrow
Currently, SuperGauge is applied manually by our research team. But the future is automated, continuous evaluation.
We are:
- Designing rule-based IC detection heuristics
- Exploring LLM-augmented evaluations
- Collaborating with open-source contributors on protocol engines
π Once automation is ready, we'll release APIs and open evaluations to the community.
Research
π§ͺ Contribute to SuperGauge Research
We're currently building a research protocol paper, including:
SuperGauge + LOKA
Integration of LOKA Protocol with SuperGauge framework for enhanced agent lifecycle management.
IC scoring weight systems
Developing domain-specific weighting algorithms for customized evaluation metrics.
Cross-domain tool validation
Methods for validating tools across multiple domains and use cases.
Auto-evaluation pilot with DSPy
Automated evaluation systems using DSPy for continuous tool assessment.
π£ Researchers, toolmakers, and evaluators, we want to hear from you.
π§ In Summary
SuperGauge is our commitment to building trustworthy agentic systems. By making evaluation structured, visible, and dynamic, we ensure every tool in our ecosystem is worthy of its intelligence.
Agentic AI must be evaluated, not just tested. SuperGauge is how we build the future, safely, smartly, and in the open.
SuperGauge is part of the Superagentic AI ecosystem