πŸŒ‰ODSC AI West 2025Official Partner & Exhibitor
San FranciscoOct 28-30
Our ODSC Story
SuperOptiX vs Agent Bricks Comparison
FRAMEWORK COMPARISON
July 19, 2025

SuperOptiX vs Agent Bricks
DSPy-Powered Titans of Agentic AI

We're entering a golden era for agent frameworks, where building powerful, production-grade AI agents no longer requires months of custom engineering. Two DSPy-powered frameworks have recently emerged as frontrunners in this space.

By Superagentic Team
15 min read
SuperOptiX vs Agent Bricks: Feature Comparison Table

We're entering a golden era for agent frameworks, where building powerful, production-grade AI agents no longer requires months of custom engineering. There are many frameworks available in the market which are based on prompt tinkering techniques. DSPy is the only framework which allows developers to focus on programming rather prompting.

This page is a graphical edition of the blog post. For the full textual version, choose your preferred platform below.

πŸ“– Read detailed version of this blog on your favorite platform

Choose your preferred platform to dive deeper

Don't have time to read? Listen instead

The first DSPy powered Agentic AI framework was released by DataBricks called Agent Bricks this year in June. Then on July 17th Superagentic AI released the SuperOptix which follows TDD/BDD for Agentic AI. Two DSPy-powered frameworks have recently emerged as frontrunners in this space: SuperOptiX by Superagentic AI, and Agent Bricks by Databricks. Both share the same underlying DNA, they leverage DSPy, the compositional optimization framework, yet their philosophies could not be more different.

The Contenders

Agent Bricks

by Databricks

Unveiled in June 2025, Agent Bricks is designed for speed, simplicity, and automation, focusing on letting enterprise users spin up agents with minimal effort.

Released: June 2025

SuperOptiX

by Superagentic AI

Released on July 17th, 2025, SuperOptiX puts engineers firmly in the driver's seat, offering full control over agent specification, evaluation, orchestration, memory, and observability.

Released: July 17, 2025

Feature Comparison

Feature
SuperOptiX
Agent Bricks
Philosophy
Engineering discipline
Automated magic
Task Definition
Structured DSL
Natural language
Evaluation
Transparent process
Auto-evaluation
Optimization
Manual strategies
TAO
Orchestration
Advanced workflows
Basic orchestration
Memory
Memory stack
Minimal memory

Philosophical Foundations: Engineering Discipline vs Automated Magic

SuperOptiX: Engineering Discipline

SuperOptiX was built for developers and AI engineers who want full transparency and control. It takes a "spec-first" approach where agents are defined declaratively using a DSL called SuperSpec, tested with BDD-style scenarios, and orchestrated in pipelines.

  • Engineering-centric design
  • Explicit specifications
  • Built-in CI/CD readiness

Agent Bricks: Automated Magic

Agent Bricks adopts a "no-code, auto-magic" approach. The idea is simple: you describe your task in natural language, and the system builds, optimizes, and evaluates your agent behind the scenes.

  • Designed for business outcomes
  • Auto-evaluation and optimization
  • Deep MLflow integration

Task Definition: Natural Language vs Structured DSL

Agent Bricks: Natural Language

"Build an agent that can analyze customer feedback and generate actionable insights for product improvement"

Super intuitive - anyone can define tasks
Great for product managers and analysts
Lacks structure and version control
Context engineering is weak

SuperOptiX: Structured DSL

apiVersion: agent/v1
kind: AgentSpec
metadata:
  name: "customer_feedback_analyzer"
  tier: "genies"
  version: "1.0.0"
spec:
  persona:
    role: "Customer Feedback Analyst"
    goal: "Analyze customer feedback and generate actionable insights"
  tasks:
    - name: "analyze_feedback"
      instruction: "Analyze customer feedback for sentiment, themes, and actionable insights"
      inputs: [{"name": "feedback", "type": "str"}]
      outputs: [{"name": "analysis", "type": "str"}]
Highly maintainable DSL specs
Enables advanced BDD-style testing
Steeper learning curve
Requires YAML and engineering mindset

Evaluation: Black Box vs Transparent

Agent Bricks: Auto-Evaluation

Agent Bricks features automatic evaluation. It generates its own benchmarks and evaluation functions, giving users instant feedback on performance.

No human control needed
Auto-generates metrics
You can't control the metrics
Evaluation logic is opaque

SuperOptiX: Transparent Process

SuperOptiX provides full control via CLI and DSL with BDD-style evaluation scenarios.

# Run BDD-style evaluation
super agent evaluate customer_analyzer --verbose

# Output:
#  Functional accuracy: 95%
#  Behavioral compliance: 92%
#  Safety checks: All passed
#  BDD scenarios passed: 80%
Full control over test cases
Output in multiple formats
Requires setup
You must write and maintain tests

Optimization: TAO vs Manual Strategy

Agent Bricks: TAO

Agent Bricks leverages TAO (Test-time Adaptive Optimization), a cutting-edge technique that uses unlabeled data to optimize agents post-deployment.

Impressive autonomy
Works with usage data only
Lack of visibility
Risk of overfitting

SuperOptiX: Manual Strategies

SuperOptiX offers multiple explicit strategies with transparent optimization paths.

# Manual optimization
super agent optimize customer_analyzer 
super agent evaluate customer_analyzer

# Available optimizers:
# - BootstrapFewShot
# - KNNFewShot
# - LabeledFewShot
Transparent optimization
Framework-agnostic
More effort required
Needs DSPy optimizer knowledge

Memory & Knowledge: Minimal vs Multi-layered

Agent Bricks: Minimal Memory

Agent Bricks offers basic vector memory, but lacks detail around long-term storage, session memory, or episodic learning.

Basic vector memory
Limited long-term storage
No session memory

SuperOptiX: Memory Stack

SuperOptiX includes a full memory stack with multiple layers and backend support.

Short-term memory
Episodic memory
Long-term memory
Semantic memory
Backends: ChromaDB, Qdrant, LanceDB, Milvus, Pinecone

Final Verdict: Choose the Titan That Matches Your Mindset

Agent Bricks Winner

Agent Bricks is the clear winner for teams that want fast deployment and automated tuning without engineering overhead. It's ideal if you're deeply integrated with Databricks, want rapid iteration, and trust automation to handle the messy details.

Fast deployment
Automated tuning
Databricks integration

SuperOptiX Winner

SuperOptiX is for those who treat AI agents as systems, who want to test, optimize, and ship with confidence. It's for developers who want version control, orchestration, memory control, and long-term maintainability.

Full control
Version control
Long-term maintainability

Important Note

Databricks is a big company with huge resources while Superagentic AI is just a 2-month-old startup. There is no head-to-head comparison at this stage, so Agent Bricks might be the right choice for most users if you're in the Databricks world. However, SuperOptiX offers an alternative if you want to do Context Engineering and let SuperOptiX handle DSPy Agent Engineering.

Ready to Choose Your Framework?

Explore SuperOptiX and see how engineering discipline can transform your AI agent development.

Related Posts

Introducing SuperOptiX AI: Full Stack Agentic AI Framework is Here

Learn about the revolutionary full-stack Agentic AI framework with evaluation-first philosophy.

12 min read

DSPy 3.0, AgentBricks, and SuperNetiX: The Future of Agent Development

Explore the latest advancements in AI agent development with DSPy 3.0 and related frameworks.

10 min read